Jump to Page
Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP Client Alert
8.13.24

What You Need to Know


The Federal Trade Commission’s April 2024 final rule on non-compete clauses, as we previously reported, would void and ban nearly all non-compete provisions as of its effective date of September 4, 2024. Among other items, the final rule, which is 570 pages in length, requires employers to send a notice to affected workers by the effective date, informing them that their noncompete clause cannot – and will not – be legally enforced. 

In a prior Client Alert on this topic, we indicated certain steps that employers should take in view of the pending effective date of the final rule. Unfortunately, while the pending effective date is less than one month away, the status of the final rule, and the related actions employers should take in view of it, remain uncertain as of this writing.

Court Challenges to the Final Rule

With the ink barely dry on the FTC’s final rule, legal action was commenced in various jurisdictions seeking to enjoin or invalidate the rule’s ban on non-competes. Such actions, two of which are discussed below, have muddied the waters concerning the ultimate outcome of the FTC’s action.

In Ryan LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting the FTC from enforcing its rule against the plaintiff in the case. Although the plaintiff had also requested a preliminary injunction which would prevent the FTC from enforcing its rule against all affected employers (i.e., a nationwide injunction), the Ryan Court refused to extend its prohibition on enforcement against any employers other than the plaintiff in this case. In granting plaintiff the requested preliminary injunction, the Court also indicated that by August 30, 2024, it will decide on the ultimate merits of the case. Among other issues, that decision may provide further direction on whether employers must send out a notice to their affected workers by September 4, 2024.

In contrast to the Court’s decision in Ryan, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in ATS Tree Services, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, held that the FTC is likely to prevail in having its rule upheld. Thus, the ATS Court declined to issue the preliminary injunction that plaintiff had sought, which would have prevented the FTC from enforcing its rule.

Guidance for Employers

Considering the above court rulings, employers should proactively take the following steps at this time:

We will continue to provide updates on the status of the FTC’s final rule and the challenges to it.  Please contact the author of this Alert with any questions or to discuss your circumstances.

Thomas C. SenterThomas C. Senter
Co-Chair, Employment Law Department
Chair, Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Practice Group
tsenter@greenbaumlaw.com
732.476.2650

Attorneys